It's been ages since I've posted on here, so there's probably no one out there anymore, but today I had a thought. This is a thought that's taken some developing, so here it is, ready to come, ready or not.
The idea of "smashing gender stereotypes" is so old that it appears to be new again. I was reminded of this as my 2-year-old daughter listened to my Strawberry Shortcake record from 1983 or so, which made fun of the boys wanting to help the girls carry their heavy baskets. Strawberry Shortcake was the strong, independent girl who didn't need any help from boys. And then I just saw this video, advertising the new "engineering" girls' toy, Goldieblox. Aside from the fact that none of those 8-year-old girls know what a record player is, let alone who the Beastie Boys are, I think I get the message. Baby dolls and pink things are for dumb girls who are stuck in the past, while smart girls want to be engineers.
Growing up I was one of those girls in that advertisement. I liked science, and did not do dolls. Every one of my heroes, from Strawberry Shortcake to Orphan Annie to Rainbow Brite told me that this was the way to go. Even Barbie taught me that, way before Goldieblox. In college I went into a scientific field where the men outnumbered women at least 10:1, sometimes more. However, somewhere in there, I realized that I missed out on something.
God made me a girl, and there wasn't much I could do to change that. This left me, at base, with an insecurity that needed to be dealt with, and I wasn't at peace until it was. It wasn't until I realized that I could be a geologist, rock hammer in hand, smashing things in the field and be a lady at the same time that I was really secure in who I was made to be. I wish someone told me you can be both: you can train to be a godly wife and mother, loving your femininity, and at the same love science, building, being dirty and outside, etc.
That's the problem with marketing to little girls the way Goldieblox does. We've all been here before, and what we're doing is teaching girls that in order to be smart and brave they must despise being feminine and maternal. This is not an either/or decision. My little girl loves pink and babies and Disney princesses. However, she is also intelligent (at 2 years old she can assemble simple Lego sets) and loves books, and I don't see any reason for teaching her that those desires are in competition.
Showing posts with label pop culture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pop culture. Show all posts
Thursday, November 21, 2013
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
...And No More Happiness!
Only the Bay Area could come up with something like this. At least we all know what kind of person takes toys away from little kids.
Monday, February 22, 2010
Seniors These Days...
The news can be seriously entertaining sometimes. The picture alone is worth a thousand words.
Monday, February 1, 2010
Better Hot Dogs with Love, Than Organic Food and Ungratitude
My old friend from college, Hannah Grieser, has a great post on her blog about enjoying all of the food God made in the world. You can read it here.
I love good food as much as the next person, I love eating it and I love making it. On my honeymoon I once spent more on a bottle of wine than on our hotel room for that night. In fact, I tend to think that most of our country's eating disorders come from not loving food enough--such as being grateful to God for all of it, and not treating hunger on the same level as an itch you need to scratch.
Still, our priorities are all confused if we believe that we can somehow attain righteousness by feeling guilty for having eaten food that was not gourmet. As if I needed to repent of listening to folk music, because I could have listened to Mozart. One example of this lack of proportion I recently saw in San Francisco--the "Healthy San Francisco Initiative" now taxes every restaurant patron in order to promote healthy lifestyles. I wonder if those lifestyles involve worshiping the true God weekly and raising godly children? San Francisco could definitely use more of that, and certainly not abortionists who encourage me to eat my vegetables
I love good food as much as the next person, I love eating it and I love making it. On my honeymoon I once spent more on a bottle of wine than on our hotel room for that night. In fact, I tend to think that most of our country's eating disorders come from not loving food enough--such as being grateful to God for all of it, and not treating hunger on the same level as an itch you need to scratch.
Still, our priorities are all confused if we believe that we can somehow attain righteousness by feeling guilty for having eaten food that was not gourmet. As if I needed to repent of listening to folk music, because I could have listened to Mozart. One example of this lack of proportion I recently saw in San Francisco--the "Healthy San Francisco Initiative" now taxes every restaurant patron in order to promote healthy lifestyles. I wonder if those lifestyles involve worshiping the true God weekly and raising godly children? San Francisco could definitely use more of that, and certainly not abortionists who encourage me to eat my vegetables
Friday, January 29, 2010
What I Think of Jay Leno
Not that anyone would care. And not that I've watched any late-night television in the last ten years or so, but I was reading on-line news headlines about the nasty exchanges he's been having and I have a little story that I think illustrates his character perfectly.
Two summers ago I was driving to meet my husband at my in-law's home in Beverly Hills. There's a small mountain pass (Coldwater Canyon) that takes you from the 101 freeway in Studio City over to Beverly Hills. After the last traffic light, the two lanes of traffic merge into one. Here I was, in my mom minivan, with two little kids inside, plodding through the intersection. After the road had already gone down to one lane, I hear a massive engine revving behind me. It got louder and louder, and I realized it was getting closer. I looked to my right and saw a car pushing past me, shoving me into the lane of oncoming traffic. As I swerved over (thankfully no one was coming straight at me), I looked next to me to see who the jerk was that was trying to kill my children. It was Jay Leno. He was driving a convertible, so it was clear who it was.
For some reason, since then, I've never found him funny.
Two summers ago I was driving to meet my husband at my in-law's home in Beverly Hills. There's a small mountain pass (Coldwater Canyon) that takes you from the 101 freeway in Studio City over to Beverly Hills. After the last traffic light, the two lanes of traffic merge into one. Here I was, in my mom minivan, with two little kids inside, plodding through the intersection. After the road had already gone down to one lane, I hear a massive engine revving behind me. It got louder and louder, and I realized it was getting closer. I looked to my right and saw a car pushing past me, shoving me into the lane of oncoming traffic. As I swerved over (thankfully no one was coming straight at me), I looked next to me to see who the jerk was that was trying to kill my children. It was Jay Leno. He was driving a convertible, so it was clear who it was.
For some reason, since then, I've never found him funny.
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
Save the Planet by Swiping Your Credit Card
So I recently saw one of these at the San Francisco airport. To make it even more embarrassing, I was at the airport at about 5:00 in the morning, and when I saw the little kiosk, I burst out laughing. I know I looked like an idiot, but not nearly as much as the person who would actually use the thing. My favorite line from the article is "[t]he traveler could then swipe a credit card to help save the planet." If only do-gooding was always as easy as swiping my credit card. I bet you get a warm, fuzzy feeling when you do it too.
My second-favorite line is "travelers...will soon be able to assuage their guilt," which makes me wonder if John Tetzel is really the one behind this thing. Does anyone else think this whole system seems the least bit fishy?
Friday, June 26, 2009
Thoughts on Michael Jackson
Thankfully I'm not sick of hearing about Michael Jackson on the news yet because I don't watch TV, and the internet doesn't scream at me (yet). I realized yesterday that when I was a kid I told my mom that I couldn't imagine a world without Michael Jackson. "Some day he's going to die!" I told her, "Yep, just like everybody else." She wisely answered. I, however, was young and couldn't believe that someone that powerful could be mortal. Maybe that's what he thought too, and that's why he got so weird.
Michael Jackson and Madonna both defined the culture of my growing-up years, but mostly because I was the only kid I knew who wasn't allowed to listen to either of them. I heard about them, read about them, looked at pictures of them, and had friends tell me about them, but they were off-limits in my house. It was one of those strange childhood things that you're not allowed to do and for some reason you become fascinated with. I remember sitting in my cousin's room looking at his Thriller poster and him telling us all about it. I remember that same cousin coming to a family dinner with one white glove on his hand. When my grandma asked him why only one he said, "You only wear one." I thought that was so cool.
Well, at least the park in Beverly Hills will be a little less creepy this year.
By the way, I finally did get to see Thriller (by junior high or so), and it is pretty cool. But it would have absolutely freaked me out if I'd seen it when I wanted to. And it's amazing how closely he ended up resembling those zombies.
Monday, June 15, 2009
Growing Up in Santa Cruz
I took my younger son to a nearby local bookstore for their "Read Time" this morning. The reader was a sweet older woman, with the perfect British accent that is necessary for a good story hour. She was reading some book about a little boy pig who was always told to make messes and wear dirty clothes (because he's a pig of course), and who had always wanted some day to have a clean room and wear clean clothes (because he didn't fit in). Anyway, at one point in the story the Mama Pig puts her son to bed with the familiar rhyme:
This little piggy went to market
This little piggy stayed home.
This little piggy had roast beef
But this little piggy had none.
And this little piggy cried "Wee," "Wee," "Wee," all the way home!
She paused here to ask the youngsters if they knew that poem too. Their usual blank stares didn't tell her much, but one mom leaned over and pointed to her son saying, "He knows it with tofu." I don't think the reader understood, so she repeated herself, "He knows it with tofu, not roast beef." (She could only bring herself to mouth the hideous words "roast beef"). At this point the employee understood, at least I'm sure more than this mom did, and repeated the poem with the more culturally sensitive changes:
This little piggy went to market
This little piggy stayed home.
This little piggy had TOFU
But this little piggy had none.
And this little piggy cried "Wee," "Wee," "Wee," all the way home!
I thought of insisting that my son knew it with "McDonald's greasy hamburgers" instead of tofu, but thought better of it an instant later. She seemed too pleased.
Thursday, June 11, 2009
I Am Michael Scott and So Are You
This is the best show that's ever been made by the entertainment industry. I haven't watched TV in ages, but I can't get enough of this one! Why is it so great you ask? Well, in the interest of entirely ruining comedy by trying to explain it away, here we go.
1. This show would make Chesterton proud. People do stupid things all day long, and it's hilarious to watch. My life would probably be even worse.
2. Everyone identifies with a different character, but nobody wants to be Michael Scott, the boss. However, the real point is that we are all Michael Scotts. Michael Scott takes every pathetic, sinful, self-centered thought every human thinks throughout the day--and then he says them out loud.
3. The one character who never repents, never changes, never apologizes, and you never feel sorry for is not Michael Scott--it is Ryan the Temp. He is pathetic.
4. Even the most admirable characters on the show mess up.
5. It tells the truth about people--and there is no laugh track.
This is not to say the show is infallible. Some of the more recent episodes make me nervous that it will plunge to the depths of foolishness and inanity where most good TV shows go to die; but I will keep my hopes up until that happens--and if it does I will keep watching the re-runs.
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
People ARE Naturally Good--Science Says So!
So, for a mild amusement, click here. It seems like scientists have "discovered" that children naturally like to share with each other; not toddlers, mind you, just older and wiser 7- and 8-year-olds. They gave each kids a pile of jelly beans to dole out, and they were remarkably generous with the other "children."
Why is "children" in quotes? Well--and here's the funny part--they didn't actually have the kid share with others. To minimize "face to face conflict" they only put a picture of a kid there for the testee to share with. Um, excuse me, but isn't that when greed manifests itself? During "face to face conflict?" Any kid knows that a picture can't steal their candy back, so why not share? They'll most likely get the bulk of candy in the end, and meanwhile, can be praised for their generosity! The only kids who didn't share--those greedy little toddlers--are still working out whether or not a picture actually could demand his fair share, and so exhibited selfishness.
Although this doesn't prove much, it does prove that these scientists think kids are dumb.
Monday, August 25, 2008
A Word on Words
I was talking with a Christian yesterday who doesn't have a problem with a lot of the feminist accommodations that we've made in our language such as "mailperson" or "flight attendant" (instead of "stewardess"). She insists that since our society has changed enough so that those jobs are no longer gender specific, we should modify our language to speak accurately.
This bothered me, but it wasn't until that moment that I could put together my reasons. The biggest reason not to change, I later realized, is that we want a culture that is shaped by the Word, not the other way around. It seems akin to those who would like a "living" Constitution for our country. The Constitution has the law for our land, and we need to make changes to accommodate it, not the other way around. A "living" Constitution (i.e., one that always means what we'd like it to mean), is really not living, but dead, because the actual words are meaningless.
It's the same way with our language. If we want a society based on The Word, then we need to respect our words, and not change them with every whim of fashion. Of course, this doesn't mean that every female mail carrier needs to quit her job, but it does mean having an open mind to the meaning of the word "mailman." Genesis 1:27 says, "And God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them." "Man" (or in Hebrew, "Adam") encompasses both male and female. We are one mankind. A female mail carrier is no less a mailman than a male mail carrier.
And I really just wrote this for the opportunity to use the phrase, "male mail carrier!"
Thursday, July 24, 2008
In Praise of Reality Television
In Neil Postman's book, Amusing Ourselves to Death, he believes that a medium's message should be appropriate to the medium. One of his points about television is that the context of the medium means that it can only propogate trite messages. Hence, the best television is bad television.
I'm beginning to see how right this is. We don't have TV at home, but while we're away in the summer we watch quite a bit of it (which makes us more grateful that we don't have it at home). I have a natural inclination towards TLC's A Baby Story or What Not To Wear; I assumed it's just because I'm a woman who's had babies and wears clothes. Still, I notice that the shows that I get the biggest kick out of are the dumbest. My husband and I saw advertised something called "I Survived a Japanese Game Show." It looked absolutely ridiculous--and I laughed out loud every time the ad for it came on! It showed something about people jumping off these giant platforms into a lake that had huge, blow-up structures in it. The people kept falling flat on their face. Every time they hit I busted up like an idiot (maybe I just don't get out much)!
I also find that I love shows like American Idol or So You Think You Can Dance for the same reason. I love it when ordinary people who have no stage presence end up on national television. They always have really sweaty armpits, or spit when they talk, or turn around in front of the camera. Maybe I'm a dweeb, but I live for those moments!
I saw an example of the opposite problem just yesterday when my boys were watching cartoons. I remember cartoons as mindless entertainment--Coyote falling off the cliff for the umpteenth time--but every kids' cartoon that they watch starts out with a message for parents on what educational or social skills the cartoon helps preschoolers develop. I also grew up with Sesame Street and Square One and loved them, so there are some aspects of educational television that I liked as a kid, but I think it's gotten totally out of control. The worst example I saw--and my total apologies out there to any of my friends who love this show, please forgive me--was something called "Lou & Lou's Safety Patrol." The story consisted of two kids (who always walked around carrying water bottles and wore bike helmets) who were helping their mom make an emergency preparedness kit. I couldn't handle it anymore! I jumped to the remote and found Tom & Jerry on Cartoon Network. Aahhhh....mindless television....(and the boys thought it was hilarious).
Thursday, June 5, 2008
ATTENTION: Guilt-ridden Consumers!
Are you feeling guilty for driving your Hummer? Does it gnaw at your conscience when you commute an hour to work each day? Do you wish you could continue to enjoy your consumerist lifestyle and still feel good about your greenhouse gas emissions?
Look no further! Carbon offsets and credits are a great way to maintain your high quality of life while reducing the effects on your conscience. Pioneered by such climate gurus as the former vice-president Al Gore, you can pay someone else to live the simple life for you!
We are a young family with two young children. We live a simple life, save money, and recycle. We are also on a single income, so there are minimal commuter costs--there are some days when we don't drive our cars at all! In fact, our life is so simple that our carbon footprint is only 1/3 of the average American family with four children.
For a low, low rate of only $500 per month we will offset all or most of your carbon footprint--granting you the piece of mind of having a zero net effect on the environment! Go ahead--live your dreams! Drive your Hummer! Take round-the-world vacations! You don't even have to recycle! Contact me with your carbon footprint information and we will arrange for deposits into our off-shore banking accounts.
Celebrate yourself and go for a drive!
P.S. Contact us today and you will receive your entire winter, high-utility seasons for the low, low cost of an extra $300/month (normally $400/month).
Saturday, May 10, 2008
If You Only Knew Me, You Would Love Me
Today I was in the liquor store buying some beer. I got behind a woman who was (of all things in a liquor store) buying a Coke. She pointed out the small, portable shots that they sell at the register to the cashier and she began lecturing her for selling those. She was upset that they were marketed toward the "youth" and when the cashier clearly didn't share her feelings, she began to plead that she knew people who were in drunk driving accidents (and that they had been the drunkard) who were never the same afterwards. I felt sorry for the cashier and told her while I was buying my beer that people have been doing stupid things with alcohol for thousands of years and it wasn't up to her to make sure they were responsible.
Of course, afterwards, I got to thinking about what the self-righteous woman said. She was really upset about the packaging of the alcohol, and not the fact of the alcohol itself (she did go in a liquor store of her own accord, to buy Coke when there's a grocery store next door). I realized that her arguments were all the same ones that people use to accuse the fast food industry of making us fat--"I couldn't help myself! They had such cool advertising!"
There is one type of person that makes their decisions based on who has the coolest packaging. We call those people children. My kids always want the cereal box with the most cartoon characters. Of course, if those same boxes contained things like beer or cigarettes, I understand being a little concerned. However, this woman was worried about ADULTS making bad decisions based on cool packaging. If that really is your problem, you have a lot more to worry about than getting drunk. You are an extremely immature person and a helpless pawn.
Her second plea, based on that you would be sensitive if you knew somebody, also seems ridiculous. How many people are more sensitive to those they know well, especially those in their own family, than they are to strangers? I've seen teenagers say horrible things to their parents that they would never say to someone they didn't know well. I wished now (of course, after the fact) that I had addressed her and said something like, "Well you must not know those people very well, or else you would be a better judge of their character." I'm supposed to pity someone who was the hopeless victim of cool advertising, bought a bunch of liquor shots, drunk them while driving, and then injured themself? I don't think so.
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
The Church Leads the World...And They Both Fall Into a Ditch...
Most of the time you hear from Christian culture warriors that we need to work on taking back Hollywood (was it ever ours?). We need to be in music and movies and all sorts of media to be a positive force in American culture. The surprising thing, though, is that the church is everywhere in Hollywood.
Both Hollywood and Bel Air have some of the most faithful churches in all of the greater Los Angeles area. First Presbyterian in Hollywood has been historically faithful (until very recently) and Bel Air Presbyterian is also a bastion of conservatism within the PCUSA. Both of these churches are huge--having thousands of members and clearly millions of dollars in tithe money. Bel Air Presbyterian alone has at least 4 different services between Saturday night and Sundays to accommodate all the worshippers.
We often hear about the popularity of bizarre cults among the Hollywood elite, like Scientology or Kabbalism, but many of the most popular stars in music and the movies come straight from the church. Jessica and Ashlee Simpson's father was a long-time pastor in a Southern Baptist church before he pushed his daughters into show business. Lindsey Lohan's father is one of the leaders of Teen Challenge, a Christian drug and alcohol rehabilitation ministry. And the biggest bomb, Britney Spears, is from a Baptist family in Louisiana. She regularly attends Bel Air Presbyterian and her mother was recently offered a contract with the Christian publishing company, Thomas Nelson, to write a book on parenting!
Do we really need to treat Hollywood like a foreign land, full of pagans? Will that help us "take it over?" The land is ours. God gave it to us and He is there. The only Christian work in Hollywood that would be blessed is one clothed in humility and repentance, starting in the churches that we already have, the pastors we already have, and the members we already have.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)